Comparative Study of the Voting Pattern in the 10th and 11th Periods of the Islamic Council Elections; Case Study: Qasr-e Shirin, Sar-e Pol-e Zahab and Gilan Gharb Constituencies

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Doctoral student, Department of Political Science, Central Tehran Branch , Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Group of Political Sciences, Central Tehran Branch , Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Central Tehran Branch , Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction

Elections, as a political behavior, are the most important arena of political participation and play a fundamental role in determining the fate of society. Participation in elections and the act of voting are also the crystallization the will of public opinion and voters. Accordingly, analyzing electoral behavior of different periods can provide a more accurate understanding of the political, social and economic developments of each period. The present study aims to investigate, explain and analyze the factors affecting electoral behavior of the tenth and eleventh periods of the Islamic Consultative Assembly elections in the constituencies of Qasr-e-Shirin, Sar-e Pol-e Zahab and Gilan Gharb. The importance, necessity and motivation for choosing the subject, on the one hand, goes back to the fundamental position of the legislative branch, whose function has a fundamental impact and role on the fate of the people and the country. On the other hand, it is related to the constituency, which has not been researched in this field so far. This work is the first study and a response to this necessity.

The theoretical framework of the research is a combination of electoral behavior models and, based on this, it analyzes the role of tribal-ethnic divide, religious divide, and city-based orientation as long-term factors and political factionalism and economic factors as short-term factors in shaping the voting pattern of the constituency.

This constituency includes three cities with a population of 165,602 people and one representative. It also has specific geographical, cultural, and historical characteristics, a diverse population, and different economic and social conditions. The people of these areas are Kurds and are formed from different tribes and clans. Culturally, they are also a mixture of Sunnis, Shiites, and Ahl al-Haqq. These characteristics have been able to leave significant and noticeable effects on political and electoral orientations over time and in different periods.



Methodology

The data gathering procedure is based library and field finding method. The number of sample is 395 people who are 20 years old and more. T-test and paired t-tests are used to compare variables in the 10th and 11th elections of the Islamic Consultative Assembly in the study area. The statistical method is used to compare the nature of the analyses.



Discussion and Results

The results showed that the long-term and short-term variables of the research have had an effect on voting behavior in both election periods. However, there are differences in the extent and manner of the effects of the aforementioned factors between the two periods. In such a way that the role of the tribal-clan divides and county orientation has increased in the 11th period compared to the 10th period, which indicates the strengthening and attention to ethnic and local identities. In contrast, the role of religious divide has decreased compared to the tenth period, which could indicate a change in voters' prioritization or a change in the approach of influential individuals in this field. The role of political factionalism and the economic factor has also been greater in the 11th period which could be due to voters' increased attention to economic and livelihood conditions and political affiliations. However, the presence of candidates as voters with special political, social characteristics and financial capabilities at unconventional expense should not be ignored in voters' behavior.



Conclusion

The analysis of the voting pattern in the constituencies of Qasr-e Shirin, Sar-e Pol-e Zahab and Gilan Gharb in the tenth and eleventh periods of the Islamic Consultative Assembly shows significant changes in voters' priorities. The results of the analysis of the voting pattern in the social, political and economic space indicate the importance of paying attention to local, ethnic, religious and cultural needs. Therefore, the analysis of the findings indicates both the change and stability of some factors in the voting pattern. Overall, the analysis of these two periods shows that voting patterns were influenced by a combination of long-term and short-term factors. While some factors, such as religious divides, have remained stable, others, such as tribal-ethnic divides, city-state orientation, and political factionalism, have seen significant changes with increasing trends. The increasing importance of economic issues in both periods also indicates that livelihood problems and obstacles have remained at the center of voters’ decision-making.

Keywords

Subjects


1.1. Imam Jumezadeh, Seyyed Javad, Karmi Rad, Javad, Analysis of factors affecting electoral behavior with a view to Iran, Political Research 2, No. 3, 36-9, 1391.[In Persian]
2. Ayoubi, Hojjatollah, Analysis of Voters' Electoral Behavior, Political-Economic Information, No. 137-138, pp. 100-1377, 111. [In Persian]
3. Darabi, Ali, Sociology of Elections and Electoral Behavior in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Political Studies, Volume 1, Number 2, pp. 67-102, 2008. . [In Persian]
4. Heydari, Nasrallah, The role of social and economic factors on electoral behavior in the Islamic Council elections: Electoral constituency of Ilam, political science doctoral dissertation, Iranian issues, Islamic Azad University, Research Sciences Unit, Tehran, 2016 . [In Persian]
5. Rozian, Aminullah, Akwani, Hamdollah, Al-Tiyaminia, Reza, Comparative study of electoral behavior of voters in presidential and Islamic council elections in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad provinces. Applied Sociology, No. 33, 83-110., 1401. [In Persian]
6. Suri Qarlivand, Hossein, Studying the effect of party competition on the electoral behavior of Khorramabad ethnic groups in the 8th Islamic Council elections, Master's thesis in Political Science, Isfahan University, 2019 . [In Persian]
7. Sheikhzadeh, Hossein, social factors affecting the participation of the people of Tehran in the elections of the 11th term of the Islamic Council. Iranian Political Sociology Monthly, No. 4, 1400-53, 75. [In Persian]
8. Qanberlou, Abdullah, The impact of elections on the international status of the government: with an emphasis on the Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic Studies Quarterly, No. 18, 1395-171-196. [In Persian]
9. Ghasemi, Hassan Ali, Studying the Electoral Behavior of the Citizens of Dareh Shahr City: With Emphasis on the Study of the 9th Election Period of the Islamic Council, Master's Thesis, Political Science, Yasouj University, 2015.. [In Persian]
10. Mohammadi, Shahram, Investigating the role of ethnic groups in the elections of the Islamic Council, a case study: the 9th elections of West Islamabad and Dalaho, Master's thesis in the field of political geography, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran branch, 2013. [In Persian]
11. Iran Statistics Center, detailed results of the general population and housing census, 2015 . [In Persian]
12. Mehrgan, Farhad, Faqihi, Abolhassan, and Mir Sepasi, Nasser, The role of political participation and democratic system in shaping political culture. Public policy in management (Government Management Mission), No. 9, 1397-1, 19. [In Persian]
13. Naqibzadeh, Ahmad, An Introduction to Political Sociology, second edition, Tehran, Samt Publications, 2006. [In Persian]
14. Nikfar, Jaseb, Jabripour, Samaneh, Collapse of tribal discourse and electoral behavior in the Islamic Council elections; Case study: Boyer Ahmad constituency in the 9th term of the Islamic Council elections. Applied Sociology, No. 30, 2018-65, 84. [In Persian]
15. Hoanarjo, Mohammad Ali, investigation of the electoral behavior of the citizens of Yasouj in the Ninth Parliament elections and the factors affecting it, master's thesis in the field of political science, Isfahan University, 2014 . [In Persian]
16. Pishgahifard, Zahra and Sadeghi, Ali, 2011, Party positions in the eighth round of the Islamic Consultative Assembly elections in the provinces of the country based on their development level, Quarterly Journal of Geographical Research, Year 25, Volume 26, No. 1, pp. 109-1390, 130. [In Persian]
17. Zarghani, Seyed Hadi and Razavinejad, Seyed Morteza, Analysis of the role of neighborhood variables in the voting patterns of candidates in the 10th presidential election, Humanities Teacher Quarterly, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp. 109-1392, 126. [In Persian]
18. Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W, Change and Continuity in the 2004 and 2006 Elections. CQ Press,2007.
19. Bostan, I, Democracy, essential element of the electronic government. Journal of Computing, 2(5). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4016v1,2010.
20. Benoit, KModels of electoral system change. Electoral Studies, 23, 363–389. (2004).
21. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. John Wiley & Sons.
22. Dahl, R. A, Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press,1989.
23. Fisher, Justin and others, The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion,London and New York, Routledge(2018).
24. Gandhi,Debu, Rational Choice Theory in Political Science: Mathematically Rigorous but Flawed In Implementation, Critique: A worldwide journal of politics, Illinois State University, Available at, (2005).
25. Gamermann, D., & Antunes, F. L, Evidence of fraud in Brazil's electoral campaigns via the Benford's law. arXiv. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08826v1,2017.
26. Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. Yale University Press.
27. Heywood, Andrew, Politics, translated by Abdolrahman Alam, second edition, Tehran, Ney Publications(2012).
28. Hobolt, Sara Binzer, '3 A Comparative Analysis of Voting Behaviour', Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration (Oxford, 2009; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 May 2009.
29. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C, Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press,2021.
30. Janoski,Thomas and others,The Handbook Of Political Sociology, State, Civil Societies, and Globalization, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,(2005).
31. Jones, N. F, Politics and society in ancient Greece,2008.
32. Liddle, R. W., & Mujani, S, Leadership, Party, and Religion: Explaining Voting Behavior in Indonesia. Comparative Political Studies, 40(7), 832–857,2007.
33. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H,The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press (1944).
34. Maškarinec, P. (2017). A Spatial Analysis of Czech Parliamentary Elections, Europe-Asia Studies, 69(3), 426–457. 2013
35. Marchi, S. D, Adaptive models and electoral instability. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(3), 393–419(1999).
36. Norris, P, Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge University Press,2002.
37. Skutilová, M, The Scottish Parliamentary Elections and the Transformation of Electoral Behaviour. Politické vedy, 26(2), 8-31,2023.
38. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E, Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press,1995.
39. O'Cass, A., & Pecotich, A,The dynamics of voter behavior and influence processes in electoral markets: A consumer behavior perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58, 406–413(2005).
40. Strøm, KA ,behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 565. Available here. (1990).
41. Sanders, M. S, Unified models of turnout and vote choice for two(1998).
42. Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J, Who Votes?. Yale University Press,1980.
43. Yang, J. C., Hausladen, C. I., Peters, D., Pournaras, E., Fricker, R. H., & Helbing, D. , Designing digital voting systems for citizens: Achieving fairness and legitimacy in participatory budgeting. Under review in ACM Digital Government: Research and Practice. Retrieved fromcandidate and three-candidate elections. Political Analysis, 7(1), 89–115.