Analyzing the Function of Urban Signs in Representing National Identity Case Study: Mural of District 6 of Tehran

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Z. Ahmadipour 1
H. Seifi Farzad,
M. Shoaibi, 2
A. Ganjipour 3
1 Geography Department, Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran
Abstract
Urban space is combination of two parts including form and meaning. The signs in the urban space together with its codes form the part of urban space meaning. Signs are the part of the visual media which are presented for the citizens, So the citizens discover code's meaning by decoding of internal concept and are influenced by it. The question is that the signs which are presented to citizens as a visual media what relations they have with national identity elements? Urban signs can have meanings of national identity elements into their codes. It is notable that prominence of some elements and factors rather than others has role in formation, reinforcement and representation of national identity. Therefore in this research an attempt has been made to evaluation of relations between the signs meaning in urban space and elements of national identity factors in the 6th, mural district of Tehran as a case study by using of qualitative analysis and the basics semiotics. The results of this research in the 6th district of Tehran indicated that urban signs are influenced by national identity factors and they have meanings and concepts of it inside themselves. Also prominences of some national identity features rather than other features lead to formation of national identity and also play the important role in reinforcement and representation of national identity by repeating the meanings influenced by national identity.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Mojtahedzadeh, P. (2017). Political Geography and Geopolitics. Tehran, Iran: Samt.
2. Gorab, N. (2013). Urban Identity. Tehran, Iran: Iran's Municipalities and village administrators.
3. Abolhasani, S. (2009). Components of national identity with a research approach. Politic Quarterly, 1-22.
4. Ghalibaf, M., & pooyandeh, M. (2011). Geographical Explanation of National Identity Basics (Case Study: Iran). National Studies, 12(45), 3-24.
5. Hafeznia, Mohammadreza, Ahmadipour, Zahra, Khojamli, Abdolvahab & Salman Ansarizadeh (2010). Representation of the Concept of Nation in Cyberspace, Geography and Regional Planning, 1-25, 1.
6. Ahmadi, H. (2007). Iran: Identity, Nationality, Ethnicity. Tehran: Humanities Research and Development Institute.
7. Aminian, B. (2007). The Impact of National Identity on Generational Connection. Youth, Culture, and Society Research, 1, 69-83.
8. Ghezelsofla, M. (2009). MEDIA & NATIONAL IDENTITY CONSTRUCT. Politic Quarterly, 39(3), 321-338.
9. McLuhan, M. (2013). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Berkeley, California, United States: Gingko Press.
10. Ahmadipour, Zahra & YunesRashidi (2018). a Geopolitical Analysis: Representation of Spaces of Fear ‎in Cinema, Geopolitics, Volume 14, Issue 50 - Serial Number 50, Summer 2018, 21-55.
11. Saadatfard, A., & Dabiri, M. (2013). The role of landscape architecture in recreating the signs of life and identity in the urban landscape. Tehran Beautification Organization, 1-23.
12. Hay, I. (2019). Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. (A. Pourahmad, & M. Eskandari Nodeh, Trans.) Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Samt.
13. Ahmadipour, Zahra, KoogamLi AbdolRahman & Mohammadreza pourJafar (2017). Geopolitical Analysis of Effective Factors on the Symbolization of Geographical Spaces of Tehran (Case Study: Symbolization of Milad Tower), International Quarterly of Geopolitics, 35-66, 13 (46).
14. Mehdizadeh, S. (2012). Media Theories Common Thoughts and Critical Perspectives. Tehran, Iran: Hamshahri.
15. Afzali, R., Rasti, O., Mottaghi, A., & Babaei, R. (2013). A New Approach to Critical Geopolitics. Tehran, Iran: Jahad Daneshgahi Publishing Organization.
16. Mir Moghtadaei, M. (2004). Criteria for Recognizing and Evaluating the Physical Identity of Cities. Honar-ha-ye-Ziba(19), 29-38.
17. Hafeznia, M. (2017). Principals and Concepts of Geopolitics. Mashhad: Papoli.
18. Mojtahedzadeh, P. (2017). Political Geography and Geopolitics. Tehran, Iran: Samt.
19. Mirheydar, D., Rasti, O., & Mirahmadi, F. (2015). The Basic Themes in Political Geography. Tehran, Iran: Samt.
20. Rezaei, S., & Joukar, M. (2010). Recognition of National Identity within the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. National Studies, 10(4 (40)), 53-88.
21. Habibi, S. (1999). Urban Space, Even Life, and Collective Memories. Soffeh, 9(28), 16-21.
22. Hafeznia, M. (2019). Political Geography of Iran. Tehran, Iran: Samt.
23. Relph, E. (2011). place and placelessness. (J. Tabrizi, Trans.) Tehran: Kavosh.
24. Sattarzadeh, D., Naghizadeh, M., & Farah, H. (2011). Urban Space, a Social Thought. Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology, 12(4), 173-183.
25. Moulavi, M. (2005). Formal Analysis of Urban Space and its Philosophical Foundations. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba, 21(21), 27-34.

26. Pakzad, J. (2019). Urban Space Design Guide. (H. Asadi khansari, Trans.) Tehran, Tehran: Shahidi.
27. Lynch, K. (2017). A Theory of City Form. (S. Bahrainy, Trans.) Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran Press.
28. Ahmadipour (2018). Study the relationship between space and gender justice; Case Study: Region 6 of Tehrn, Political Geography Research, Article 6 , Volume 3, Number 2 - Consecutive Issue 12 , Spring 2017 , pp . 141-162 .
29. Arianpour, M. (2017). English - Persian Dictionary. Tehran, Iran: Jahan Rayaneh.
30. Mohsenian Rad, M. (2017). Communicology. (J. Rasi e Tehrani, Ed.) Tehran, Iran: Soroush.
31. Pirhayati, M. (2009). An Introduction to Myths (Identity, Mysticism, and Culture). Qom, Iran: Sohravardi.
32. Saussure, F. d. (2017). Course in General Linguistics. (K. Safavi, Trans.) Tehran: Hermes.
33. Ahmadi, B. (2019). From Pictorial Signs to the Text: Toward the Semiotics of Visual Communication. Tehran, Iran: Nashre Markaz.
34. Ahmadi, B. (2019). Structure and Interpretation of Text. Tehran, Iran: Nashr-e Markaz.
35. Giro, Pierre (2008). Semiotics, Teranslated by Mohammad Nabavi, Tehran, Aghah.
36. Lynch, K. (2017). The Image of the City. (M. Mozayeni, Trans.) Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran Press.
37. Barthes, R. (2019). Myth Today. (S. Daghighian, Trans.) Tehran, Iran: Nashr-e Markaz.
38. Thwaites, T., Davis, L., & Mules, W. (2002). Introducing Cultural and Media Studies: A Semiotic Approach. London, England: Red Globe Press.
39. Davarpanah, A. (2012). An Introduction to the Management and Application of Symbols and Signs in Urban Space. Tehran: Tehran Beautification Organization.
40. Hoopers. J (1991). Introduction on Sign: Wrritings on Semioticby Charles Snaders Perice. ChapelHill: University of North Carolina Precc, 1-13.
41. Chandler, D. (2018). Semiotics: The Basics. (M. Parsa, Trans.) Tehran, Iran: Soore Mehr.
42. Majedi, H., & Saeedeh Zarabadi, Z. (2010). An Investigation in the Urban Semeiology. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 3(4), 49-56.
43. Pourjafar, M., & Montazerolhojjah, M. (2009). Landmarks: Definitions, Typology, Site Selection, Planning & Design. Tehran: tahan.
44. Khojamli, Abdolvahab, Ahmadipour, Zahra, Hafeznia, Mohammadreza & Mohammadreza Pourjafar (2016). Geopolitics of Urban Landscape: The Relation between Politics and Power with Urban Symbolization, Political Geography Research, Article 1 , Volume 1, Number 3 , Fall 2016 , Pages 1-28.
45. Davarinezhad, M., & Mahboot, M. (2013). Urban Space Recognition. Tehran, Iran: Tahan.
Political Organizing of Space
Volume 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 6
December 2020
Pages 132-146