واکاوی سیاست گذاری فضایی مدیریت ریسک سیلاب روستاهای واقع در حوضه آبخیز گرگان‌رود استان گلستان

1. بدری سیدعلی ، رضوانی محمدرضا و خدادادی پروین، (1398)، طراحی الگوی چالش های تدوین سیاستگذاری فضایی مناطق روستایی کشور، فصلنامه مجلس و راهبرد، سال بیست وششم، شماره 99.
2. حاجی بیگلو، محبوبه ، شیخ واحدبردی،(1396)، تحلیل مدیریت ریسک سیلاب براساس مفاهیم خطر، مواجهه و آسیب پذیری با ارائه چارچوب‌ها و مدل‌ها، نشریه آب و توسعه پایدار، سال پنجم، شماره 1، ص 73-82
3. شکری، شهاب الدین و آرکیوف آلکسی، اوریج و فیلوننکوبولیا، ویاچسلاواونا و اسپیریدانوا بلوکریلوا، اولگا و مارینا، سانیکوا (1398)، تببین نقش سیاست‌گذاری بر نهادسازی مدیریت مخاطرات در مناطق روستایی و کشاورزی روستو آن دن در فدراسیون روسیه، پژوهش‌های تروجی و آموزش کشاورزی، دوره 12 شماره 1، صص 54-39.
4. Tempels B, Hartmann T (2014) A co-evolving frontier between land and water: dilemmas of flexibility versus robustness in flood risk management. Water Int 39: 872-883.
5. Saidi, A. (2013), Structural-functional dynamism, an alternative approach in apatial planning. Journal of Space economy and rural development, (1), pages 1-18.
6. Hartmann T, Spit T (2016a) Legitimizing differentiated flood protection levels – Consequences of the European flood risk management plan. Environ Sci Policy 55: 361-367.
7. Foudi S., Osés-Eraso N. and Tamayo I. 2015, Integrated spatial flood risk assessment: The case of Zaragoza,. Land Use Policy Journal, 42: 278–292.
8. Erdlenbruch K., Thoyer S., Grelot F., Kast R. and Enjolras G. 2009., Risk-sharing in the context of the French Flood Prevention Action Programmes, Environ. Manage Journal, 91: 363–369.
9. Evers M., Jonoski A., Almoradie A. and Lange L. 2016., Collaborative decision making in sustainable flood risk management: A socio-technical approach and tools for participatory governance, Environmental Science & Policy Journal, 55(1): 335–344
10. UNISDR. 2015. Making development sustainable: the future of disaster risk management. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.18356/bd3a73ea-en.
11. Associated Programme on Flood Management (APFM). 2017. Selecting measures and designing strategies for integrated flood management - a guidance document. Associated Programme on Flood Management.
12. Samuels P, van Os A (2008) Towards flood risk management in the EU: State of affairs with examples from various European countries. Int J River Basin Manage 6: 307-321.
13. de Bruijn, K., F. Klijn, M. Caroline, M. Marjolein, and W. Henk. 2008. Long-term strategies for flood risk management: scenario definition and strategic alternative design. Floodsite report T14-08-01.
14. WMO. 2009. Integrated Flood Management Concept Paper. Geneva.
15. Tanner, P.; Rentschler, T.; Davis, I.; Wisner, B. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters; Routledge: London, UK, 2015.
16. Cash, D. W., W. N. Adger, F. Berkes, P. Garden, L. Lebel, P. Olsson, L. Pritchard, and O. Young. 2006. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 11(2):8.
17. Dore, J., and L. Lebel. 2010. Deliberation and scale in mekong region water governance. Environmental Management 46(1):60–80.
18. Mostert, E., M. Craps, and C. Pahl-Wostl. 2008. Social learning: The key to integrated water resources management? Water International 33(3):293–304.
19. Young, O. 2006. Vertical interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecology and Society 11(1).
20. Van Buuren, A., G. J. Ellen, and J. F. Warner. 2016. Path dependency and policy learning in the Dutch delta: toward more resilient flood risk management in the Netherlands? Ecology and Society 21(4):43. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08765-210443
21. Ran, J., and Z. Nedovic-Budic. 2016. Integrating spatial planning and flood risk management: A new conceptual framework for the spatially integrated policy infrastructure. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 57:68–79.
22. Carpenter, S., B. Walker, J. M. Anderies, and N. Abel. 2001. From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? Ecosystems 4:765–781
23. public, J.E., Booher, D.E., 2021. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Plan. Theor. Pract. 5 (4), 419–436.
24. Statistical Center of Iran. 2020. Available online: https://www.amar.org.ir (accessed on 10 September 2020).
25. Report of East Azerbaijan Province. 2019. Available online: https://azsharghi.mporg.ir/ (accessed on 15 September 2020).
26. MohitPrakashMohanty,VittalH,VinayYadav,SubimalGhosh,GoruSrinivasaRao,SubhankarKarmakar.,(2020) A new bivariate risk classifier for flood management considering hazard and socio-economic dimensions, Journal of Environmental ManagementVolume 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109733
27. Nordbeck Ralf , Steurer Reinhard & Löschner Lukas, (2019), The future orientation of Austria’s flood policies: from flood control to anticipatory flood risk management, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management ,Volume 62, Issue 11, PP 1864-1885.
28. Cumiskey, Lydia Ruth (2020), A framework for assessing integration in Flood Risk Management with applications to England and Serbia, Middlesex University London in partial fulfillment, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology.